Sunday, October 30, 2011

thing 16: see an experimental play

i've participated in a show or two back in the day.  heck, i threw toilet paper and did the time warp dance just as much as any other rocky horror picture fan.  so, when a colleague told some of us about a play she saw and loved, a few of us decided to see it while i was in nyc for a way-too short trip.  it seemed to be a stroke of luck we were even able to get tickets to “sleep no more,” so surely that was a sign we were meant to go.  right?

“sleep no more” is not billed as a play; rather, it is an immersive experience.  it is loosely based on a 1930s version of macbeth, but i know macbeth - and i found it a stretch to follow and find connections.  (in fact, i may have to go back and fish out my copy to re-read and possibly change that statement.)  anyhow, the play takes place in the fictitious mckittrick hotel, which happens to be the old tunnel night club i went to in another lifetime, but that’s another story.  upon entering the hotel, each person got a playing card, and a host called up “guests” to enter based on their card suit - which meant groups were separated.  my friends and i could not bear the thought of enduring this alone, so we blatantly lied and huddled together in order to stay together as we boarded the elevator to who knows where.  during the ride, we were told to walk towards the light, be totally silent, never take off our masks, and to be willing to explore every nook and cranny.  i have to admit that i was more than a bit creeped out.

once the elevator reached its destination, we were directed down the initial dark hallway and ended up on a shop street with a tailor, an office with a coffin, which was filled with notes, someplace that had a bathtub and bunches of dried herbs hanging from the ceiling, which constantly got stuck in my hair, a candy store, a private investigator’s office.  from there, we watched a scene spontaneously unfold, and when the characters split, we randomly chose one and followed - with masses of other people, trying not to trip on one another.  depending on who you followed and when, dictated what you saw next.  it is simply impossible for everyone to see/experience the same thing, which explains why people come multiple times.  (thinking about it now, the idea may be to follow a single character and pursue him/her throughout the experience to get a more cohesive understanding on what the heck is happening.)

as you wandered (carefully and slowly) down dark corridors and winding back stairways, meandering into individual rooms, you were encouraged to be curious and poke around in
drawers, journals, trunks, and bookcases - and, if you know me, you know that just fed just my nosey tendencies.  that said, it was a very voyeuristic experience, and sometimes i felt uncomfortable as if i were spying on people’s private moments.  while you could do just about anything and go just about anywhere, silence was strictly enforced.  we even got shooshed for saying "excuse me" (when we bumped into people) or said "bless you" (after someone sneezed) by the ultra serious black masked and clothed people, who almost totally blended into the walls, which was freaky.  clearly, verbal nicities were not encouraged or even necessary.  not even the actors spoke. music was the cue to the mood - well, assuming you were not able to determine pitch darkness, the sound of scads of birds flapping their wings, and brief flashes of light meant something ominous was about to happen.


scenes varied from baths, fights, a mother nursing her baby, all sorts of dances, simulated sex in phone booths, characters leaving notes in rooms, a tailor mending a shirt, a witch gathering tears from a crying woman.  i thought the creepiest rooms were the children's bedrooms, the nursery with the headless baby mobile, the living area that had every picture and mirror turned to face the walls, the cemetery, which was pitch black with only white crosses visible - and it was cold with a breeze.  apparently, there were also hospital rooms, a padded room with straight jackets hanging all about, and an operating room, but we totally missed those - again, because of who you chose or chose not to follow.  there were at least four floors to explore.  it was a totally massive space, but you had no sense of where you were at any given time.

aside from the crowds, the smells, the smoke machines, and the bizarre scenes unfolding around every corner, the most annoying factor was the mask.  my beak (and everyone else’s, to be fair) protruded so much that when i bent down to inspect or to read something, i constantly pecked some surface or another - which, ultimately caused the mask to shift so that my eyeglasses were no longer in line with the mask eye holes.  i spent a good chunk of the night rearranging the mask to fit the eye holes to align with my glasses.  i realize everyone wears masks to signify being invisible, and this was reiterated when the actors ignored the patrons and just bumped into us as if we weren't there.  that said, there was some major group scrambling to avoid the naked man (save for an animal head) covered in blood, and more than a few random toes were crushed.

as mentioned earlier, everyone chased after their selected actor and saw totally individual scenes.  the only exception was the finale.  each character ends up at a banquet table - bringing the masses of people following them into the space.  suddenly, a noose descends from the ceiling, and a  way-too happy man, who was initially thrilled to put his head in the noose, changes his mind . . . but he's ignored, and, before you know it, he is swinging wildly into the crowd, struggling with the rope - above our heads and creating a much-needed breeze.  at this point, i was so done.

on the way out, a book was for sale to fill in the gaps and to explain the story and characters.  really, i just paid $80 to see this immersive production.  shouldn't i know the story by the end and not have to spend an additional $30 to explain what i just experienced?  while i still cannot figure out entire scenes, and the first sentence out of mouth when we could speak was "what the hell was that play all about,” i’m left wondering if everyone else understood what they just saw or am i just a simple girl who understands mama mia?

i'd say i didn't care for "sleep no more," but my friends and i have been talking about it for four days.  maybe the sign of an intriguing book/movie/play is its "staying with you power," as opposed to whether or not you enjoyed it.  i suppose you don't always have to like something for it to be considered good.  thankfully, i can now close my eyes and not see hundreds of white beaked people surrounding me.   i would not do this 44 thing again - well, maybe i could be convinced . . . if it was free, and i had a few drinks. . . 


my look for the evening . . .



on to thing 17 . . .

Sunday, October 9, 2011

things 15: get certified in cpr

i am not particularly good in crisis-like situations. case in point . . . err, points . . . when jack got his head stuck in a fence, i just stood there, repeating somewhat frantically, "his head is stuck. his head is stuck. get it out."  when jack fell off the monkey bars and bit through his tongue, i barely kept my stomach together - even the doctor commented on how this accident "was no big deal" when she saw my reaction. (i have to admit though, this injury was fascinating to watch heal.) then there was the scooter accident that warranted nine stitches under jack's chin. all i could focus on while trying to get back home was arguing with john that it was serious enough to go to the hospital. afterwards, the only thing that got me to apply ointment to the area over the next week was knowing that if jack had a terrible scar, it would be my fault. (jack, on the other hand, wanted the scar since he decided it would be a cool story.  boys . . .)

everyday for the past seven years, no matter where we go, we have benadryl and an epi pen for jack, who has life-threatening allergies to all nuts. i am not exaggerating when i say that every few weeks, i take the demo epi pen out of my bag and practice on myself. i am convinced that should i ever need to use the epi pen, i will panic and bumble the entire process, sticking the needle into some random body part of some random person instead of where it needs to go in jack's thigh. my repeated practicing is in the hopes that should we ever be in that situation, i will go into auto pilot and just know what to do. this is what lead me to thinking about cpr . . . i've always thought it was a good idea to know how to perform cpr, but, in reality, i just kept pushing it aside. i made excuses about not having time or about not really ever needing it. after all, i've made it this far and have not needed to know. then again, when i thought about it, between jack and the volunteer work i do, there was no excuse not to know.

the class was cpr/aed for adult, children, and infants, as well as first aid. it was seven hours over two nights, and what amazed me during the introductions was that out of the seven people there, only one person was there because they had to take the class. the rest of us were there because this was just something we wanted to learn. the people were friendly and despite the serious nature of the class -- meaning, what we were learning and why -- it actually was fun. the instructor said she believed that humor helped people to learn and retain information, and she was right. she had a casual teaching style and said jokes that may (or may not) make some cringe. we were all engaged even when we had to partner with classmates and practice being the unconscious victim and/or responder and roll them over or practice being the chocking victim and/or responder, which did not have a mannequin like the cpa/aed part of the course. i'm really not a fan of strangers touching me (see spa blog) or lying on a dirty floor, but i let it go.

i studied my notes; i read the book; i lay in bed that night visualizing all of the procedures.  i was set to pass -- and i did.  that said, a few thoughts to pass along . . .

  • let’s hope that if i ever need to use cpr, i instinctively follow what i learned without panicking (see first paragraph above).
  • let’s both hope that if it’s you i need to rescue using cpr (1) the rescue people arrive in less than the average fifteen minute response time or (2) my arm muscles have strengthened or (3) you start breathing on your own somewhere around five minutes.
 
clara barton i am not, but i am hereby certified through 2013 . . .
 
on to thing 16 . . .